ACTSC

AcronymDefinition
ACTSCAustralian Capital Territory Supreme Court
References in periodicals archive ?
104) See Smith (2010) 41 WAR 217, 233 [75] (Buss JA); Central Goldfields Shire v Haley (2009) 24 VR 378, 381 [5]-[6] (Neave JA); Victorian WorkCover Authority v Jones LangLasalle (Vic) Pty Ltd [2012] VSC 412 (12 September 2012) [5] (Beach J); Georges v Victoria [2013] VCC 1235 (19 September 2013) [14] (Parrish J); Brozinic v ISS Facility Services Australia Ltd [2014] ACTSC 8 (7 February 2014) [51]-[52] (Master Mossop).
See also Brozinic v ISS Facility Services Australia Ltd [2014] ACTSC 8 (7 February 2014) [52] (Master Mossop).
2011] ACTSC 202 (16 December 2011) [48] (Besanko J); Brozinic v Iss
154) RvSP [No 2] [2006] ACTSC 78 (12 July 2006); Re KMV [2003] QMHC 005 (5 August 2003); Karyn Louise Kemps case; R v McAvoy [2003] SASC 225 (23 July 2003).
191) See, eg, R v Kain [2009] ACTSC 103 (26 August 2009) [21] (Gray J); Sleiman v Murray (2009) 231 FLR 224, 228 [20] (Refshauge J); R v Austin [No 2] (2010) 5 ACTLR 70, 73 [3] (Refshauge l).
192) Re Application for Bail by Paul Blundell [2008] ACTSC 138 (3 December 2008) [2] (Ref shauge J), quoting B v Police [No 2] [2000] 1 NZLR 31, 34 (Blanchard J).
52) See, eg, Re an Application Pursuant to the Births Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1997 [2000] ACTSC 39 (5 May 2000) [14] (Crispin J); Re Mark (2004) 31 Fam LR 162, 174 (Brown J).
See also Paramasivam v Flynn [1998] ACTSC 10 (Unreported, Gallop J, 2 March 1998) [36].
See also R v Esposito (1998) 45 NSWLR 442, 458-0 (Wood CJ); Moffatt v The Queen (2000) 112 A Crim R 201,209 (Wood C J); R v Taylor [1999] ACTSC 47 (Unreported, Higgins J, 26 May 1999) [23]-[32]; R v Munce [2001] NSWSC 1072 (Unreported, McClellan J, 14 November 2001) [22]-[29]; R v Waters (2002) 129 A Crim R 115, 122-5 (Gray J); R v Fischetti [2003] ACTSC 9 (Unreported, Gray J, 26 February 2003) [7]-[10].
201) The law in Australia appears to have diverged from that in England by asserting that a duty of loyalty, which may be fiduciary in nature, survives the termination of the retainer: see Spincode Pty Ltd v Look Software Pty Ltd (2001) 4 VR 501; Wagdy Hanna & Associates Pty Ltd v National Library of Australia [2004] ACTSC 75 (Unreported, Higgins CJ, 1 September 2004) [31]-[42]; McVeigh v Linen House Pty Ltd [1999] 3 VR 394; Wan v McDonald (1992) 33 FCR 491, 512-13 (Burchett J); cf Belan v Casey [2002] NSWSC 58 (Unreported, Young CJ in Eq, 4 February 2002) [21].
However, no reveal is available on the basis of credibility findings unless it was wrong in law for the trial judge to rely on credibility as the basis for the verdict: see, eg, State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588, 620-2 (Kirby J); Williams v Minister, Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (1999) 25 Fam LR 86 (Supreme Court of New South Wales); Williams v Minister, Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 [2000] Aust Torts Reports [paragraph] [paragraph] 81-578, 64 136 (Spigelman CJ, Sheller and Heydon JJA) (New South Wales Court of Appeal); Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees [No 2] Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424, 437-8 (Drummond, Mansfield and Allsop JJ); Tapp v Thamer [2002] ACTSC 86 (Unreported, Miles CJ, 29 August 2002).
40) DPP v Nicholson (1997) 27 MVR 120; R v Williams (Unreported, Supreme Court of Tasmania, Court of Criminal Appeal, Neasy, Cox and Underwood JJ, 14 May 1985); R v Wright (1991) 60 A Crim R 215; R v Hinton (1995) 128 FLR 139; R v Taylor [1999] ACTSC 47 (Unreported, Higgins J, 26 May 1999); R v Malloy [1999] ACTSC 118 (Unreported, Crispin J, 9 November 1999).