84) Belcher v Aboriginal Rights League Inc (1999) 45 AILR
This reverses the effect of the decisions in CPSU v Telstra Corporation Limited (2000) 48 AILR 4-292, in which a Full Bench of the AIRC found that its statutory procedural powers (particularly to give directions to the parties in an industrial dispute) applied not only when the Commission was arbitrating, but also in conciliation; and Sensis Ltd v CPSU (2003) 128 IR 92, where a Full Bench confirmed that the AIRC could exercise those powers when conciliating under s 170NA of the 1996 Act (for example, it could give directions to resolve disputes between the parties about who should represent them in bargaining negotiations, and to ensure that fair processes are adopted); see further below.
CPSU v Sensis Pty Ltd (2003) 53 AILR 100-005; CPSU v Sensis Pty Ltd (2003) 53 AILR 100026(58).
35) See Fyffes Group Ltd v Templeman  2 Lloyd's Rep 643, 672 (Toulson J) ('Fyffes'); Colour Control Centre Pry Ltd v Ty (1996) 39 AILR
261) See Edmonds v Donovan  VSCA 27 (Unreported, Winneke P, Charles and Phillips JJA, 22 February 2005) - (Phillips JA); Lord Corporation Pty Ltd v Green (1991) 22 NSWLR 532, 543-4 (Cohen J); Addstead Pty Ltd (in liq) v Liddan Pty Ltd (1997) 70 SASR 21, 43-4 (Perry J); Colour Control Centre Pty Ltd v Ty (1996) 39 AILR
[paragraph]5-058, 4319 (Santow J); Green v Bestobell Industries Pty Ltd  WAR 1, 19 (Kennedy J).
High Court decisions (Ranger Uranium Mines case (1987), 163 CLR 656, Fruehauf Trailers case (1988), AILR