SURTASSSurveillance Towed Array Sensor System
References in periodicals archive ?
Lanny Sinkin, a lawyer in Hawaii, filed a lawsuit against the Navy in February last year, claiming the use of SURTASS LFAS before the completion of an environmental impact assessment violated US law.
But of more than three dozen mentions of SURTASS LFA in leading defense trade publications since 1990, none have described the system as a counter to quiet subs in the open ocean.
Which is precisely what SOSUS and previous versions of SURTASS did.
As we shall see, these questions prove central to the origin and intended use of SURTASS LFA.
Why are representatives of the Wisconsin Humane Society, and of dozens of other animal welfare and environmental organizations, corresponding with the US Navy about SURTASS LFA?
This is more or less the scenario activists fear: that the deafeningly loud sound pulses generated by SURTASS LFA will prevent marine mammals from feeding, from navigating successfully to calving grounds, from finding members of their families.
Activists and the Navy disagree as to the subjective intensity of the sound generated by SURTASS LFA.
Acoustic scientists disagree as to what level of sound in air would be the equivalent of a 140 dB pulse from a SURTASS LFA array 300 nautical miles away, but most generally subtract 26 dB from underwater sound intensities to find equivalently loud sounds in air at sea level.
A] 60 dB difference represents a million-fold power difference; so, [sic] it can easily be seen how misleading it can be to try to compare underwater sound that a system like SURTASS LFA sonar makes with in-air sound that a jumbo jet makes.
Ironically, the best existing set of safety standards for exposure to low-frequency sonar comes from the same institution planning to contravene those standards with SURTASS LFA: the US Navy.
Other SURTASS LFA tests have done damage to whales.
They decry the fact that the Navy's Draft OEIS/EIS claims SURTASS LFA poses no overwhelming threat to cetaceans or other wildlife, despite the fact that the Navy's tests included no long-term monitoring of animals in the test areas.