At an 8 phr level, the HV2 and the TMPT showed significant improvements over the control compound.
When the 8 phr compounds were evaluated, TMPT, SR500 and SR517 had improved elongation retention versus the control compound after 70 hours at 150[degrees] C.
The TMPT material provided distinct improvements in viscosity reduction, modulus and cure speed versus the control material.
For TMPT contents of up to approximately 10 phr, a slight increase in tensile strength can be observed over the entire range of radiation doses.
At a TMPT content of 10 phr, however, this product has reached its solubility limit in the compound, and after being stored for a few days, the TMPT migrates out of the compound.
The 300% modulus (figure 3) increases with radiation dose, reaching a plateau at, again, a TMPT content of approximately 10 phr (supersaturation).
From the 300% modulus it can be established that there is no or hardly any difference between the use of EDMA and of TMPT.
The decrease in the elongation at break reveals no difference between using EDMA and TMPT, while the other methacrylates investigated did not differ from one another in terms of elongation at break.
It may be concluded that the methacrylate derivatives are more effective than the allyl compounds, with EDMA having the same effectiveness as TMPT.