The hypothesis is that the UTRCA will defer a greater percentage of subdivision applications in regulated areas than the HCA.
For the entire 2001-2010 period, the UTRCA deferred approximately fifty-eight percent of all subdivision applications in regulated areas.
The new regulation was received differently by UTRCA and HCA staff.
After the introduction of the new regulation, the UTRCA deferred sixty-four percent of applications in regulated areas, while the HCA deferred twenty-three percent.
Thus, in a comparison of the UTRCA and the HCA it appears as though board composition plays an important role in policy implementation.
At the UTRCA, where board membership is fragmented, staff expressed confidence in their new regulatory authority and their expanded role as an advocate for natural hazard and natural heritage protection.
For the entire 2001-2010 period, the UTRCA deferred fifty-eight percent of all subdivision applications in regulated areas and the HCA deferred forty-one percent.
2) On two applications, one from 2009 and another from 2010, the UTRCA issued a recommendation of "deferral or refusal.