These considerations seem alone sufficient to authorize a conclusion, that the Supreme Court would have been an improper substitute for the Senate, as a court of impeachments.
Would it have been an improvement of the plan, to have united the Supreme Court with the Senate, in the formation of the court of impeachments?
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
In all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.
The judges of the Supreme Court and justices of the peace seem also to be removable by the legislature; and the executive power of pardoning in certain cases, to be referred to the same department.
The executive chief, with six others, appointed, three by each of the legislative branches constitutes the Supreme Court of Appeals; he is joined with the legislative department in the appointment of the other judges.
Supreme Court until having perhaps been enforced for many
At this reception we met many Americans, among them Justices Fuller and Harlan, of the United States
Supreme Court. During our entire stay of a month in Paris, both the American Ambassador and his wife, as well as several other Americans, were very kind to us.
The Judicial Council confirmed on August 21 that there are four candidates who want to become new
Supreme Court president, replacing Daniela Svecova in her post.Stefan Harabin, Jana Bajankova, Ivetta Macejkova and Soa Mesiarkinova will battle for the top post at the
Supreme Court in the election scheduled for September 9, the TASR newswire reported.
Nagdecide na ang
Supreme Court (We have to always follow the law since it is needed.
They said that
Supreme Court in its verdict has not asked the Prime Minister to resign.