The nonparametric
Wilcoxon test was used to test for statistical significance (p=0.0078, ** p [less than or equal to] 0.05, n=8).
Tables 2-3 show descriptive statistics (median and interquartile range) and
Wilcoxon test results for the comparison of adolescents' accelerometer-measured PA and sedentary behavior during in-school time and school breaks between HCA and non-HCA days.
As indicated in the righthand column, significant differences were found between CP1-4 and CP1-6 and CP1-7 in the
Wilcoxon test. Results show that performance of the CP 1-4 algorithm to be optimal when the [k.sub.1] = 1 and [k.sub.2] = 4.
Relationships between sex and IOP measured in sitting, standing, and supine positions were not statistically significant according to the results of the
Wilcoxon test (p=0.59, p=0.69, p=0.54).
Differences between numbers of male and females captured by an attractant trap were analyzed using the
Wilcoxon test. All the P values less than 0.05 are shown.
Calculation of hazard ratios ([less than or equal to] median versus >median expression); GehanBreslow-
Wilcoxon test, # p < 0.05; log-rank Mantel-Cox test, no significant differences.
(a) Combined BMD LS and left TH vs BMD TS alone, p value <0.001 (post hoc
Wilcoxon test).
Post hoc analysis between two groups was performed with the
Wilcoxon test. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical data between groups.
Pre-exposure and post-exposure ABR thresholds and cytokine levels were compared within the groups using the
Wilcoxon test, and among groups using the Mann-Whitney U test.
According to the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, either it will be a right-tailed test or a left-tailed based on the
Wilcoxon test Statistic (S).
Descriptive statistics, the correlation of companies' liquidity in different years, and the
Wilcoxon test were analyzed to evaluate the significance of the median differences.
For continuous parameters, the intraindividual differences were tested by the
Wilcoxon test. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the Cohen weighted K, with strength of agreement expressed by K value as follows: <0.2 poor, 0.2-0.4 fair, 0.4-0.6 moderate, 0.6-0.8 good, and 0.8-1.0 excellent.