AEMG

AcronymDefinition
AEMGAlliance Electronics Marketing Group (various locations)
AEMGAlan Ett Music Group (Studio City, CA)
AEMGAdverse Effects Methods Group (est. 2007; Cochrane Collaboration; UK)
AEMGAsociación de Escritores Mayances de Guatemala (Mayan Writers' Association of Guatemala)
References in periodicals archive ?
Data showed significant improvement AEMG in the taping group after taping, implying that kinesiology taping can activate the muscles.
Taping group Control group p value Number 10 9 Age (years) 59 (3.2) 60 (2.3) 0.939 Male: female 7:3 6:3 0.875 Left: right (hemiplegia) 4:6 5:4 0.498 Time poststroke (weeks) 18.3 (0.82) 19.2 (2.49) 0.502 Pain 4.3 (1.2) 5.0 (0.7) 0.111 Subluxation (cm) 1.22 (0.39) 1.18 (0.33) 0.807 ROM (F) (degrees) 27.8 (6.1) 31.7 (7.6) 0.238 ROM (Abd.) (degrees) 24.8 (5.5) 25.6 (6.8) 0.763 AEMG (S) ([micro]V) 152.6 (27.9) 163.3 (33.1) 0.925 AEMG (D) ([micro]V) 126.8 (11.5) 134.6 (10.4) 0.482 Note.
Average EMG (AEMG) before and after vibration stimulation
The mean values and SDs of AEMG (vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RF)) before and after 20min of vibration stimulation in all groups are listed in Table 2.
AEMG values in each quadriceps femoris muscle (VL= vastus lateralis, VM = vastus medialis, RF = rectus femoris) measured before and after 20min of vibration and that of relative change after vibration in both study groups.
For the control group, the aEMG consistently increased from 100% to 160% HAT.
Differences in aEMG between groups were evident in the right ULES at 140% HAT.