AGF

(redirected from Adjusted Goodness of Fit)
Category filter:
AcronymDefinition
AGFAjinomoto General Foods (Japan)
AGFAnimate Girls Festival
AGFAsian Games Federation (est. 1949)
AGFAnglo-German Foundation (UK)
AGFAssume Good Faith
AGFArmy Ground Forces
AGFAmerican General Finance
AGFAmazing Grace Fellowship (various locations)
AGFAssurances Générales de France
AGFAll Good Friends (gaming clan)
AGFAmerican Growth Fund (mutual fund)
AGFAmerican Gas Foundation (Washington, DC)
AGFAarhus Gymnastikforening (athletic clubs, Denmark)
AGFAnatomic Gift Foundation
AGFAutologous Growth Factor
AGFArbeitsgemeinschaft der Grossforschungseinrichtungen
AGFAnnual Green Fee (golf)
AGFAlberta Global Forum (Canada)
AGFMiscellaneous Command Ship (US Navy ship designation)
AGFalt.gothic.fashion (newsgroup)
AGFAgen, France - La Garenne (Airport Code)
AGFAbove Ground Facility (utilities)
AGFAtlas Geo File (GIS Software Format)
AGFAnarsist Genclik Federasyonu (Federation of Anarchist Youth, Turkey)
AGFAngle of Greatest Flexion (biology)
AGFAsociación Guatemalteca de Franquicias (Spanish: Guatemalan Franchise Association; Guatemala)
AGFArtificial Ground Freezing
AGFAssociated Grocers of Florida
AGFAdjusted Goodness of Fit
AGFAll Glass Fiber
AGFAllmerica Global Funding LLC
AGFA Gentleman's Film
AGFArbeitsgemeinschaft Fuzer (gaming clan)
AGFAlternative Gothic Fashion
AGFAnnual Global Funding
AGFActive Geological Fault
AGFArray Green's Function
AGFAutomatic Guided Flight
AGFAverage Gain Factor
AGFAngioblastic Growth Factor
AGFAcid Gas Flaring (fuel refining)
AGFAviation Guided Flight
Copyright 1988-2018 AcronymFinder.com, All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
(d) Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (indice de bondad de ajuste corregido.
This conclusion is supported by the Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI), the goodness of fit (GFI), the adjusted goodness of fit (AGFI), the Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI), Expected Cross-Validation Index (ECVI) and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC).
Overall Fit and Explanatory Power of the Models TAM TPB DTPB Chi square/Degrees of freedom 2.94 2.98 2.20 Goodness of fit index .90 .93 .93 Adjusted goodness of fit index .86 .89 .84 Normed fit index .95 .96 .95 Root mean square error of approximation .07 .07 .06 Recommended criteria (a) Chi square/Degrees of freedom [less than or equal to] 3.0 Goodness of fit index [greater than or equal to] .90 Adjusted goodness of fit index [greater than or equal to] .80 Normed fit index [greater than or equal to] .90 Root mean square error of approximation [less than or equal to] .08 Note.
These criteria were Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) and Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (GFI).
[chi square] = chi-squared; df = degrees of freedom; RMSEA = root mean squared error of approximation; GFI = goodness of fit index; AGFI = adjusted goodness of fit index; CFI = comparative fit index; AIC = Akaike information criterion (calculated as: [ci square] - 2gl).
In addition, the indexes of normed fit (NFI), nonnormed fit (NNFI), comparative fit (CFI), goodness of fit (GFI), and adjusted goodness of fit (AGFI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were as follows: NFI = .96, NNFI = .97, CFI = .97, GFI = .90, AGFI = .87, RMSEA = .61, which showed that the proposed model had a very good fit.
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.90 For testing the relation between developmental managers and selection & transfer of technology,
The following criteria were used as indices of an acceptable model fit: (1) Goodness of Fit (GFI) > .90; (2) Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) > .90; (3) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < .05; (4) Comparative Fit Index (CFI) > .90 and (5) X2/gl < 3 (Kline, 2005).
On the other hand, normed fit index, comparative fit index, goodness of fit index, and adjusted goodness of fit index values (see Table 1 in Simsek, 2007) between .90 and .95 show acceptable fit, and values above .95 show ideal fit.
Despite the fact that the sensitivity of the chi-square statistic for a large sample does not allow to reach the desired level of probability, the two-factor model fit the data well, as can be observed in the following goodness-of-fit indexes: [chi square](26, N = 395) = 60.66, p < .00; normal chi-square (CMIN/DF = 2.3); goodness of fit index (GFI = .97); adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI = .95); comparative fix index (CFI = .96); and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA = .05).
In terms of RMSEA, goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), comparative fit index (CFI), normed fit index (NFI), and root mean residual (RMR), these two models had good fit.
Full browser ?