BFSS

AcronymDefinition
BFSSBritish Field Sports Society (UK)
BFSSBritish and Foreign School Society (registered charity)
BFSSBioremediation in the Field Search System (software; US EPA)
BFSSBlack Forest Soaring Society (Colorado)
BFSSBroad Field Social Studies (various universities)
BFSSBona Fide Seniority System
References in periodicals archive ?
Eventually, with the 1997 election approaching, key hunting activists started to organise protest activities themselves, effectively circumventing the BFSS establishment and isolating it through the launch of a broad, loose coalition, the Countryside Alliance.
Many of the activists were disillusioned members or supporters of the NFU, FUW, CLA, CPRE, or BFSS.
Technically, the BFSS still existed in the background, but its old leadership and structures had become marginalised.
The Countryside Alliance had already been reborn as a formal organisation early in 1998, incorporating the BFSS and two smaller groups.
Based on the results using the BFSS method, the combination of upgrades with the lowest total life cycle cost was the same as the one identified in the previous case; however, the HRV with 70% efficiency was the least cost upgrade solution at the end of Round 3 (not Round 6), as shown in Figure 6.
2012) and Dembo (2011) to determine a combination of considered optimal upgrades using the BFSS method for the other cities (Ottawa, Windsor and Thunder Bay) in Ontario.
For the second part, the combination of optimal upgrades were determined using the BFSS method for various cities in Ontario, namely Ottawa, Windsor and Thunder Bay with distinct climatic conditions, following the same methodology used in the studies by Dembo et al.
2012) and Dembo (2011), the combination of the optimal upgrades was determined using the BFSS method for the climatic condition of Ottawa, Windsor and Thunder Bay, respectively.
Figure 2 show the selection of the final upgrade by round using the BFSS method for Ottawa, Windsor, and Thunder Bay, respectively.
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 4 ROUND 5 ROUND 7 ROUND 7 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 = UPG5 = C1 BS1 UPG2 UPG2 UPG2 = UPG3 = UPG4 = UPG5 AGW1 BGW2 F1 UPG3 UPG3 UPG3 UPG4 UPG5 UPG4 UPG4 UPG4 UPG5 UPG5 UPG5 UPG5 UPG7 UPG7 = V1 UPG9a =GH3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 4 ROUND 5 ROUND 7 ROUND 7 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 = UPG4 = UPG5 = C1 F1 BS1 UPG2 UPG2 UPG2 UPG2 = UPG4 UPG5 AGW1 UPG3 UPG3 UPG3 = UPG4 UPG5 BGW2 UPG4 UPG4 UPG4 UPG5 UPG5 UPG5 UPG5 UPG7 UPG7 = V1 UPG9a =GH3 Figure 4 Least cost upgrade by round using the BFSS method for Ottawa and Thunder Bay (top), and Windsor (bottom) (Case 2a).
ROUND ROUND ROUND ROUND ROUND ROUND ROUND 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 = UPG5 = BS1 c1 UPG2 UPG2 UPG2 = UPG3 = UPG4 = UPG5 AGW7 BGW2 F1 UPG3 UPG3 UPG3 UPG4 UPG5 UPG4 UPG4 UPG4 UPG5 UPG5 UPG5 UPG5 UPG7 UPG7 = V1 UPG9a = GH3 ROUND ROUND ROUND ROUND ROUND ROUND 6 ROUND 7 1 2 3 4 5 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 UPG1 = UPG4 = UPG5 = C1 F1 BS1 UPG2 UPG2 UPG2 = UPG3 = UPG4 UPG5 AGW7 BGW2 UPG3 UPG3 UPG3 UPG4 UPG5 UPG4 UPG4 UPG4 UPG5 UPG5 UPG5 UPG5 UPG7 UPG7 = V1 UPG9a = GH3 Figure 6 Least cost upgrade by round using the BFSS method for Otta and ffinds or (top), and Thunder Bay (bottom) (Case 2b).
Based on the results of the reduced appliance and lighting consumptions, and using the economic parameters identified in Case 1, the combination of optimal upgrades in net present value was determined using the BFSS method, which was almost identical to the one identified in the previous case using the standard operating conditions in HOT2000 for all three cities.