Category filter:
CAICCard Accepter Identification Code
CAICColorado Avalanche Information Center
CAICCentro de Apoyo Integral a la Comunidad (Spanish: Integrated Community Support Center; Guatemala)
CAICCaribbean Association of Industry and Commerce
CAICCalifornia Alliance for Inclusive Communities
CAICCalifornia Automobile Insurance Company
CAICContribution in Aid of Construction (various locations)
CAICCult Awareness and Information Centre (Brisbane, Australia)
CAICCanadian Association of Interventional Cardiology
CAICCash Accumulation Insurance Contracts (Geneva Media Holdings, LLC)
CAICConsistent Akaike's Information Criterion
CAICCampaign Against Immigration Controls (UK)
CAICContractor Appraisal Information Center (US Army Corps of Engineers)
CAICClub Alpino del Instituto de Ciencias (Spanish: Alpine Club of the Institute of Science; Mexico)
CAICChemical Accident/Incident Control
CAICCorps Airspace Information Center
CAICCare Abounds in Communities (Lutheran charity)
CAICCatanduanes Agricultural and Industrial College
CAICConference on Algorithms and Complexity
CAICCard Accepter Identification Code (EFTPOS transactions)
CAICChild Abuse Index Check
Copyright 1988-2018, All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
In contrast to many Australian peers, expenses outside AISC fell to less than 10% of CAIC. Hartleys estimates Perseus' total corporate costs were A$96M in JQ2019, compared to $95M in MQ2019 and the average for the last seven quarters of A$104M.
MLEs (and the corresponding standard errors in parentheses), AIC, BIC and CAIC statistics for number of successive failures for the air conditioning system.
Tabela 1 Criterios de qualidade de ajuste da esat-br Criterios M1 M2 [ji al cuadrado] 540,388 383,609 Gl 269 222 [ji al cuadrado]/gl 2,00 1,728 GFI 0,837 0,871 AGFI 0,837 0,840 AIC 652,388 491,609 CAIC 899,440 729,838 TLI 0,854 0,908 CFI 0,869 0,919 RMSEA 0,067 0,057 SRMR 0,063 0,062 Nota.
The researchers found that 1 percent of 2,692 men reported CAIC, were HIV-negative, and used PrEP in 2013, compared with 5 percent of 3,660 men in 2016 and 16 percent of 4,018 men in 2017 (P < 0.001).
The number of classes was chosen based on the following selection criteria: (1) interpretability; (2) parsimony; (3) lowest information criteria scores (AIC, adjusted AIC, BIC, and CAIC); (4) entropy > 0.7; (5) average posterior probability in each class >0.75 and no more than 10% overlap/cross-membership between noncontiguous classes; and (6) at least 2.5% of the total sample size in each class using parameters from Nylund et al.
Then, we report the maximum-likelihood estimators (and the corresponding standard errors in parentheses) of the parameters and values of AIC, BIC, HQIC, and CAIC in Table 2.
Indices d'ajustement pour les modeles theoriques eprouves YB RB F-S ddl P NNFI Modele 1 (facteurs de 2e ordre) 1.45 28, 28 0,17 0.94 Modele 2 (5 PRM correlees) 1.41 24, 32 0,11 0.87 Modele 3 (unidimensionnelle) 2.56 35, 21 0,01 0.76 CFI RMSEA CAIC Modele 1 (facteurs de 2e ordre) 0.96 0.09 -98.96 Modele 2 (5 PRM correlees) 0.93 0.14 -75.00 Modele 3 (unidimensionnelle) 0.81 0.16 75.35 Tableau 3.
The frequently-used fitting parameters in latent profiling analysis include: Bayesian Information Criterions (BIC) [17] and consistent Akaike Information Criterion (cAIC).
We carefully inspected these parameters for interpretability and used this information in combination with goodness of fit statistics [Akaike information criterion (AIC) (Akaike, 1987), Bayesian information criterion (BIC) (Schwartz, 1978), consistent AIC (CAIC) (Bozdogan, 1987) and adjusted BIC (aBIC) (Sclove, 1987)] to select the final number of latent classes, to which we then added labels to describe the individuals grouped within each class.