Also found in: Medical.
CAR1cAMP Receptor Subtype 1
Copyright 1988-2018, All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
From Table 1, we can find out that the average performance of DBA is better than the other two variants of DBA; for benchmarks Car1 to Car8, the DBA-IVPNS is better; the reason may be that the IVPNS implementation is singlepoint operation on the current global best individual gbest_x; this operation may improve the quality of solution, bur this needs much computing time, so the DBA-IVPNS have more time to explore of more new position.
From Figure 8, we can see that the gradient in s x t space is which means that the terminal velocity of the urgent individual is zero, and this satisfies the requirement of the problem definition in Section 3.1; for example, in Figure 8(b), urgent individual 2 takes the maximal acceleration until reaching A point before Car1 arrives at his path and then switches to deacceleration for the path A-B in case of colliding with Car2.
For the identification we used three vehicle classes, which are named car1, car2 and large track.
Quadro 3: Modelo inicial da AFC V14 v31 v13 v30 v24 v32 v19 = CAR1 V17 v10 v1 v23 v20 = ATT2 V28 v26 v29 v2 v15 = EEN3 V16 v12 v8 v7 = GQP4 V25 v6 v27 v18 v5 v4 v9 = CCRP5 V22 v11 v21 v3 = AF6 Fonte: elaborado pelo autor.
A chapter is devoted to a discussion of clinical amplitude/velocity reference imaging (CAR1), one of the first available in textbook format, as the procedure is still in the experimental phase.
Day 1 (the first day for which returns are available) has an average AR of -0.18% (test -statistic 0.47), and the CAR1,t at day t = 10 is -0.03%, at day 50 is -1.62%, and at day 100 is -2.75%.