The basic conditions of CEUS were machine-designed.
Doctors with more than 5 years of experience with CEUS performed ultrasound examinations.
Among 12 missed cases by CTA in Group A, eight were verified as having endoleak by CEUS and seven were verified by CDFI.
The diagnostic values of CEUS and CDFI in assessing post-EVAR endoleak in our cases were statistically different ( P = 0.
Six patients with high-pressure endoleaks (three cases of type I and three cases of type III) received endovascular re-intervention guided by CEUS results.
We investigated the performance of CEUS on post-EVAR endoleaks not correctly diagnosed by CTA, and also compared the diagnostic value of CEUS and CDFI in these cases.