CFCSSControl-Flow Checking by Software Signatures
References in periodicals archive ?
The reason is that the number of additional instructions in CFCSS is 2-4, 6 in CFCVE and 7 in RSCFC.
8 was generated based on the WR in Tables 3 and 4 and illustrates the fraction of faults that are not detected for the original programs and the hardened programs with CFCSS, RSCFC and CFCVE under each fault types.
8, the average undetected incorrect outputs for CFCSS, RSCFC and CFCVE are 12.
Thus, the error detection coverage is higher than CFCSS.