001 (Table 3) comparing restaurants with a CFSM to restaurants without a CSFM with the number of risk factors cited during restaurant inspections.
Restaurants without a CFSM had significantly higher food safety scores (mean = 87.
Table 6 shows the results between restaurants that have a CFSM and restaurants that do not have a CFSM from the three districts on the number of risk factors.
In the analysis performed to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between restaurants that have a CFSM and restaurants that do not have a CFSM from the three districts on the restaurant food safety score identified on restaurant inspections, the main effect for district was not statistically significant--indicating that the food safety scores for restaurants from the three regions did not differ, F(2, 1541) = 1.
Several studies have examined the relationship among certified managers, risk factors, and restaurant scores and found that scores and the number of risk factors improved with the presence of a CFSM (Cates et al.
While restaurants with a CFSM had significantly more risk factors than restaurants without a CFSM, the number of risk factors for chain restaurants was significantly lower than that for independent restaurants.
TABLE 3 Results From Independent-Samples t-Test Comparing Restaurants With and Without a Certified Food Safety Manager (CFSM) in Terms of the Number of Risk Factors (N = 1,547) Group Mean SD t df p-Value Without a CFSM 0.
99 bin for the AC and CFSM in the top row disappear in the bottom row.
14) The results are not different for any of the charities across treatment either: 69% and 61% for ACS, 54% and 54% for the AC, and 52% and 47% for the CFSM in the Direct treatment and the Intermediary treatment, respectively.