EHRREuropean Human Rights Reports
EHRREssex Human Rights Review (journal)
EHRREast Haven Rifle Range (Connecticut)
Copyright 1988-2018, All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Tarsasag A Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary, [2011] 53 EHRR 3, at paras 26-28, 36; Independent News and Media Limited v A, [2010] EWCA Civ 343, [2010] 1 WLR 2262 at paras 39-44; R (Guardian News and Media Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court, [2012] EWCA Civ 420, [2012] 3 WLR 1343 at paras 41-53.
(4.) Kalashnikov v Russia [2002] ECHR 596 (2003) 36 EHRR 34, online: European Court of Human Rights <{%22itemid%22:[/022001-60606%22]}>.
(195.) See Ahmad, 4 EHRR 126, [paragraph] 15 (stating "the applicant remained free to resign if and when he found that his teaching obligations conflicted with his religious duties.").
The appeal court set out the facts and considered the cases of Johansen v Norway 23 EHRR 33 and R v Finland [2006] FLR 923.
Austria, 1993, 15 EHRR 437, it was held that a measure was a therapeutic necessity couldn't be regarded as inhuman or degrading.
United Kingdom et al., [2011] ECHR 1093; [2011] EHRR 18; 30 BHRC 561 (2011).
(112.) Behraini v France [GC] (dec), No 71412/01, [2007] 45 EHRR SE
The point has been made at a higher level of abstraction by the House of Lords, where it was pointed out that the standard of review of legislation pursuant to the Convention was more rigorous than that applied when general principles of judicial review are applicable: R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26, paras 25-28 (Lord Steyn); see also Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para 138.
[78] Laskey v UK (1997) 24 EHRR 39; see further the discussion in A Ashworth Principles of Criminal Law (6th ed Oxford University Press 2009) 311-314, see also the discussion below under 7.
United Kingdom, (2003) 37 EHRR 28 (relating to the extension of Heathrow Airport) and Fagerskjold v.