4th DCA 1989) (trial court did not "errD
in limiting appellants' presentation to the jury to the question of whether there was fraud on the part of appellees directed solely to the arbitration clause, as compared to the broader question of whether there was fraud in the inducement as to the entire account agreement," because in prior appeal "the cause was remanded to the trial court for determination of whether there was fraud in the making of the agreement to arbitrate").
Since the inception of ERRD
, the bank (has) been dogged by criticism that it's wasteful, ineffective, and counterproductive.
, American Interior no 1, 1968, ADAGP, Paris/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.