EWCA

AcronymDefinition
EWCAEngland and Wales Court of Appeal (UK)
EWCAEuropean Writing Centers Association
EWCAEast-West Center Association (Honolulu, HI)
EWCAEuropean Workshop on Conformal Antennas (est. 1999)
EWCAEthiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority (Ethiopia)
References in periodicals archive ?
With 43 chapters present at the conference, EWCA President Edward J.
Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2010] EWCA Civ 1482, [2011] Fam Law 232 (Eng.
For example, Hurst v Leeming [2001] EWHC 1051 (Ch); Dyson v Leeds City Council [2000] CP Rep 42; Dunnett v Railtrack (n 53); McCook v Lobo and Others [2002] EWCA Civ 1760; Leicester Circuits (n 7).
Meiklejohn v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 120.
14) Consider Hammond v Osborn [2002] EWCA Civ 885; Randall v Randall [2004] EWHC 2258 (Ch).
Leisureplay Pic [2005] EWCA Civ 963 where Clarke and Arden LLJ agreed that the factors could include "market expectations" in the relevant sector.
72) Kaye v Robertson, [1990] EWCA Civ 21, [1991] FSR 62 [Kaye] (photography using flash bulb is not battery, although Glidewell LJ, at 68, was "prepared to accept that it may well be the case that if a bright light is deliberately shone into another person's eyes and .
IBA Health, [2004] EWCA (Civ) 142, on appeal from IBA Health v.
See Seed & Stark, [2007] EWCA (Crim) 254 [439-40] (noting the provisions in the 2003 Act that favor non-prison alternatives and address the need for parsimony in punishment).
2) R (BM) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, [2010] EWCA Civ 65, [2010] EWCA Civ 158, [2011] QB 218.
64) Which included having to correct a statement made in one of his own judgments about the effect of the Dean v Hornby decision: see Masefield EWCA [2011] 3 All ER 554, 570-1 [52], 572 [56] (Rix L J).
On 23 June 2010, on an appeal to it in the last of these cases, Medeva's SPC Applications [2010] EWCA 700, the English Court of Appeal referred a number of questions to the CJEU, in the light of decisions in Norway and Germany that were apparently inconsistent with the approach taken by the Patents Court.