FAC2

AcronymDefinition
FAC2Field Artillery Command and Control
References in periodicals archive ?
Similar results were found in the present study with resistance exercises, in less time in balance evaluated through the force platform, and in the QOL in which there was improvement in the Fac1, Fac2, Fac4, Fac5, and TS.
D.O: dato observado; D.E: dato estimado; FB: Sesgo Fraccional; NMSE: Error Cuadratico Medio Normalizado; FAC2: factor de dos; r: Coeficiente de correlacion Contaminante n Media D.O.
(v) Fraction within a factor of two (FAC2) is given by:
Statistical evaluation of the models results are given in Table 8, which compares the Standard method, Power law of sigma, Briggs formulas and Hosker expression in terms of FB, FAC2, NMSE, MG and VG.
Additionally, it is observed that the IOA metric (index of agreement) goes from poor (P) to good (G) when the model is adjusted for least squares, the MG and FAC2 metrics continue poor (P) and only a slight improvement is found in its values.
Comparing tables 3 and 4, it can be seen that the unadjusted model's MG, FAC2 and IOA metrics were poor (P).
The scattered diagram of RH is shown in Figure 2(b), which shows FAC2 of 90.73%.
no 3 15 4 15 9 1 2 3 4 5 FAC1 4,33 3,88 3,97 4,5 4,61 FAC2 3,89 3,28 3,75 4,53 4,78 FAC3 4,5 4,46 2,25 4,77 4,72 FAC4 4,67 3,66 4,44 4,6 4,61 FAC5 4,83 3,76 4,25 4,67 4,5 FAC6 2,67 2,66 2,69 1,87 4,33 FAC7 1,67 4,04 3,75 4,73 4,44 Source: Elaborated by the authors.
Where: FAC1 = Reliability; FAC2 = Access; FAC3 = Ease of use; FAC4 = Personalization; FAC5 = Credibility; FAC6 = Security; fac1 = Security; fac2 = Responsiveness; fac3 = Ease of Use; fac4 = Availability; fac5 = Reliability; fac6 = Personalization; fac7 = Access; Edu = Education Levels; [SQ.sub.p] = Internet Purchasers' Perceived Overall Service Quality; [SQ.sub.NP] = Internet non-purchasers' Perceived Overall Service Quality; and [[beta].sub.1] and [[gamma].sub.1] represent the parameters to be estimated.
Where: FAC1 = Reliability; FAC2 = Access; FAC3 = Ease of use; FAC4 = Personalization; FAC5 = Credibility; FAC6 = Security; fac1 = Security; fac2 = Responsiveness; fac3 = Ease of Use; fac4 = Availability; fac5 = Reliability; fac6 = Personalization; fac7=Access; Edu =Education Levels; S[Q.sub.p] = Internet Purchasers' Perceived Overall Service Quality; S[Q.sub.np] = Internet non-purchasers' Perceived Overall Service Quality; and [[beta].sub.i] and [[gamma].sub.i] represent the parameters to be estimated.