FDCRSFamily Day Care Rating Scale
References in periodicals archive ?
To determine the impact of caregiver education, one-way ANOVAs were computed to examine four levels of education relative to FDCRS subscale and composite scores.
Further, we specifically examined the impact of specialized early childhood training on the quality scores in this sample of family child care homes by conducting one-way ANOVAs to examine four levels of early childhood professional development (none, TECTA, CDA, or 2year degree or higher in an early childhood education program) relative to FDCRS subscale and composite scores.
TECTA and caregiver highest education level or CDA and caregiver highest education level) predicted the five FDCRS subscales and composite scores.
TECTA) had the strongest positive impact on FDCRS scores as compared to general educational level.
Medidas de calidad de cuidado en hogares comunitarios de bienestar tradicionales Educacion de las FDCRS total FDCRS FDCRS procesos madres comunitarias infraestructura Escala 1 a 7 Escala 1 a 7 Basica primaria 2,72 1,88 2,89 Tecnica / Tecnologa 3,03 2,17 3,20 Promedio total 3,10 2,30 3,20 Educacion de las KIDI Educacion madres comunitarias (% correcto) MC (anos) Basica primaria 0,53 Tecnica / Tecnologa 0,60 Promedio total 0,57 9,3 FDCRS: Escala estandarizada de calidad en centro (Fomily Doy Core Roting Scole).
No significant correlations were found between the PANSS subscales and the different FDCRS parameters among the nonschizophrenic inpatients.
Finally, the FDCRS, to the best of our knowledge, has not been used previously in schizophrenic adolescents.
In contrast, the lack of correlation between the FDCRS subscales and the positive subscale of the PANSS suggests that the influence of positive psychotic processes on dream content is limited.
It can be argued that the lower ratings on several FDCRS parameters among the schizophrenic inpatients are a consequence of the manner in which they describe their dreams rather than the result of impoverishment in dream content.