(redirected from Grade Level Equivalent)
Category filter:
GLEGLOBE (Global Learning and Observation to Benefit the Environment) Learning Expedition
GLEGrade-Level Expectations (education)
GLEGainesville (Amtrak station code; Gainesville, TX)
GLEGrand Luxe Electronic
GLEGrand Luxe Executive
GLEGrand Luxe Extra
GLEGl Extrusion
GLEGrand Luxe Elegant
GLEGlobal Laser Enrichment (Wilmington, NC)
GLEGood Luck Everyone
GLEGraphics Layout Engine
GLEGreater London Enterprise
GLEGrand Lodge of England
GLEGround Level Elevation (measurement)
GLEGround Level Enhancements
GLEGlobal Leadership & Entrepreneurship (Regent University; Virginia Beach, VA)
GLEGran Logia de España (Spanis: Great Lodge of Spain)
GLEGoal Line Extended (Lacrosse)
GLEGrade Level Equivalent
GLEGreat Lakes Energy
GLEGlencairn Gold Corp (stock symbol)
GLEGtk+ Layout Engine
GLEGaming Life Expo (poker)
GLEGrand Luxe Executive (automobiles)
GLEGas Liquids Engineering Ltd (Calgary, Alberta, Canada)
GLEGoose Lane Editions (Canadian publisher)
GLEGlobal Lift Equipment (Spain)
GLEGeneral Law Enforcement
GLEGlobal Leadership Education
GLEGrey-Level Expansion
GLEGlobalized Localized Expert
GLEGrand Lake Entrance (RMNP)
GLEGeneva Lakes Executives (forum)
Copyright 1988-2018, All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
The average text has a readability score landing somewhere between 6-70 (University of Memphis, 2006).) The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level assessment was applied to the Handbook in order to determine the grade level equivalent of its raw score, the Handbook received a grade level score of 11.2, whereas most standard documents are written to be communicated between 7.0 to 8.0 grade level equivalents (Microsoft Corp, 2002).
When the SMOG Readability Formula is used to determine reading level, the Handbook obtains a grade level equivalent score of 14.
The results of the two tests reflect greater than two years difference between the grade level equivalent results from the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level score and the SMOG Readability Formula score.
Meta-analyses are cited, which found that summer learning loss equaled at least one month of instruction as measured by grade level equivalents on standardized test scores, that summer loss was more pronounced for math facts and spelling--both factual/procedural rather than conceptual learning; and that individual differences among students may also play a role.