The qualitative and quantitative comparative study found in the second part of this article limits its scope to claims before the
HRTO and the BCHRT.
See Gungor v Canadian Auto Workers Local 88, 2011
HRTO 1760 at paras 48-58.
See Swain v MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP, 2015
HRTO 1011.
In Forrester v Peel (Regional Municipality) Police Services Board, 2006
HRTO 13, (CanLII) [Ontario], when a police strip search was conducted improperly, the complainant was successful in a case of discrimination on the basis of sex.
(100) Chu v Dufferin Peel Catholic District School Board, 2009
HRTO 1303.
Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2006
HRTO 32, 58 C.H.R.R.
(133) Even more controversially, in Barker v Service Employees International Union, Local I Ontario, the
HRTO agreed to hear Barker's complaint even though her termination grievance had been dismissed by an experienced and respected arbitrator, on the ground that the arbitrator had "not appropriately dealt with the human rights components of this case".
Clennon v Toronto East General Hospital, 2009
HRTO 1242 at paras 104-106 (available on QL).