References in periodicals archive ?
As a first step in testing the Linder theorem and concurrently averting other explanations such as the factor endowment provided by the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model or country advantages in a ricardian manner, the structure of exports and imports should point to a predominant intra-industry trade.
En Colombia economistas como Eduardo Sarmiento (2000, 2002) senalan que el teorema Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (en adelante H-O-S) es falso, ya que se basa en supuestos irreales: segun este, la apertura economica seria un juego de suma cero donde el avance o desarrollo de algunos paises se hace a costa del atraso de los demas, y anade que un pais no puede concentrar su produccion en los bienes de mayor productividad porque su demanda esta limitada, y se encuentran sobre ofertados.
The only possible downside to the book is the amount of repetition used to emphasize, but in stealth fashion, that the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (H-O-S) Theory of comparative advantage is the golden path of enlightenment for optimal development growth.
In particular, it seeks to blend the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model of "factor proportions theory" with the so-called "technological catching-up hypothesis" through a study of East Asian development experiences in the last half century.
Modern free trade argument is based on the so-called Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson theory (or the HOS theory)', explains Cambridge development economist Han-Joon Chang.
Old trade theory, based on theoretical Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson and Viner-Meade frameworks, provided a strong set of tools for analyzing issues arising not only from the formation of free trade agreements, but also from trade liberalization (Robinson et al.
Perhaps it is this apprehension that influences the authors to orient the readers with the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson theorems in standard 2 x 2 framework and the 2 x 3 specific factor model, popular in international economics.
We use a standard 2x2 Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson framework for a small open economy.
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (HOS) model has been challenged in several ways.
As familiarity becomes complete, the results of the 2 x 2 Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model are obtained.
In the extended Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model of international trade, trade patterns are explained by variations in factor endowments, including human capital, among economies.
One extreme, from a theoretical standpoint, is typified by a Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson world in which all transactions are conducted in a perfectly competitive environment, which is a variant of the factor endowment explanation of trade.