IHLC


Also found in: Medical.
AcronymDefinition
IHLCInupiat History Language and Culture (Alaska)
IHLCInstitute of Hispanic-Latino Cultures (University of Florida; Gainesville, FL)
Copyright 1988-2018 AcronymFinder.com, All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
For each of the 13 patients, the diagnostic sample's M-spike and iHLC value was defined as 100%, and subsequent values were expressed as a percentage of this initial value.
Total IgA quantification and the IgA iHLC for the 149 IgA MM samples were compared, and Passing-Bablok linear regression gave a slope of 1.124 (95% CI 1.015-1.194) (Fig.
It consists of 18 items with three IHLC PHLC and CHLC subscales.
For the six-item IHLC Cronbach alpha the correlation coefficient was 0.61; for the six-item CHLC Cronbach alpha the correlation coefficient was 0.8; for the six-item (PHLC) Cronbach alpha the correlation coefficient was
It is composed of 18 items with three subscales: (a) IHLC contains items 1, 6, 8, 12, 13, and 17 (sample item: "If I get sick, it is my own behavior which determines how soon I get well again"), (b) PHLC contains items 2, 4, 9, 11, 15, and 16 (sample item: "Whenever I do not feel well, I should consult a medically trained professional"), and (c) CHLC contains items 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 18 (sample item: "My good health is largely a matter of good fortune").
Mean and standard deviation were calculated for IHLC, PHLC, CHLC, and AAS items.
Crude odds ratios of nonadherence for each one SD decrease in scale score were 1.51 (95% CI: 0.89 to 2.56) for DMSES, 1.46 (95% CI: 0.87 to 2.46) for IHLC, 1.10 (95% CI:0.67 to 1.82) for MH, and 1.23 (95% CI: 0.74 to 2.05) for BD.
The adjusted odds ratios of nonadherence for each one SD increase in scale score was 2.27 (95% CI: 0.99 to 5.21) for DMSES, 1.89 (95% CI: 0.76 to 4.70) for IHLC, and 1.49 (95% CI:0.71 to 3.15) for MH.
The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the subscales ranged from 0.68 to 0.39 (for IHLC, 0.68; for CHLC, 0.59; for PHLC, 0.66; for FHLC, 0.39), and test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.56 (for IHLC, 0.70; for CHLC, 0.70; for PHLC, 0.65; for FHLC, 0.56).
Finally, the fourth variable entered into the equation was internal health locus of control (IHLC) scores which accounted significantly for an additional 1% of the variance of the PSCS (F (1,339) = 4.07, p < .05).
Median splits of scores on the three HLOC subscales (IHLC = 23.0, CHLC = 16.0, PHLC = 19.0)--a procedure designed to provide appropriate cut-off points when sample size is large (Wallston & Wallston, 1981)--yielded the eight possible groupings of high and/or low control.
Table 1 HLOC Raw Scores (N = 506) M SD IHLC 22.7 4.6 PHLC 19.0 5.8 CHLC 16.3 5.2 Table 2 Two-Tailed Pearson Correlations Between HLOC Subscales and Total SE (N = 506) Total p SE IHLC .138 .002 CHLC -.223 .000 PHLC .104 .019 Table 3 Total SE (z-Scores) for the Eight Locus of Control Groups Total SE n M SD NS 95 .02 .79 PP 47 .21 .69 DE 53 -.25 .74 YS 81 -.02 .77 BiC 58 .37 .59 T-VI 41 -.29 .74 PI 66 .13 .77 PC 65 -.23 .91