irrespectively of its readings) IWFC is nothing but an useless fiction.
Now let us try to estimate the usefulness and truthfulness degrees of IWFC. Such an estimation can be obtained if IWFC is regarded through the details of its constituent elements.
So came into an equivocal sight IWFC knew a lot of debates (see [1-3] and references).
Consequently, even if in the main the item [I.sub.2] is a true assertion, the subterfuge S supporting IWFC proves oneself to be nothing but an useless recommendation.
The previous discussions about IWFC lead us also to the following more general Remark (R)
Then the mentioned killing decay is in fact a twin analogue of the single sampling noted above in item [I.sub.1] in connection with IWFC.
The mentioned analogy motivates us to discuss on some contiguities among questions specific to the alluded experiment and those regarding IWFC. We think that, according to the above remark R, the main point of such motivated discussions is to mark down the following Notification (N)
We point out, on the one hand, the historical emergence of the IWFC from the conflict between the items [I.sub.1] and [I.sub.2] mentioned in Section 2.