References in periodicals archive ?
Targeting and J2/ISR personnel at the JOC should handle any target that emerges following the JTCB because it becomes out of cycle if it cannot be approved at the board.
This friction between component commanders forced the JFC to appoint his deputy as the JTCB lead.
Each command has a JTCB of some form, but there is not a higher-level command JTCB to synchronize both target lists and set priorities for intelligence collection.
Regardless of the name of this new organization, it should combine the intelligence and operations targeting functions performed by a JTCB. For simplicity, this organization should be referred to as the Strategic JTCB (S-JTCB).
The most effective ISR support to the JFACC thus requires the same or greater levels of planning as the traditional JTCB process.
JTCB processes focus on weapon platforms to include the traditional bombers and fighters effects to the role of nonkinetic effects that help enable EBO conditions.
A JFC-adopted AOD with integrated ISR effects may also be the procedure to establish an ISR linkage to nontraditional ISR sensors during the JTCB processes.
When guided by an overarching statement of ISR strategy/priorities (i.e., AOD), the JTCB and JCMB processes can accomplish this feedback.
This AOD approach provides the JFC and component commanders, through the JFACC, a viable means for guiding airborne ISR effects and assessment at the JCMB, just as they do at the JTCB. OIF demonstrated that the JFACC could successfully direct theater airborne ISR platforms and sensors during TST scenarios earmarking the JFACC/AOC as the "supported" theater ISR [C.sup.2] node and coordinating authority for supporting ISR.
The JFACC normally leads the JAOP process, which plans and executes targeting priorities determined by the JTCB. The JFACC could allocate ISR assets as he does traditional weapon systems from other services in support of the JFC's campaign objectives.
Acronyms browser ?
Full browser ?
- JTC Enumeration Cross Checker
- Jtd Modified