LTDV

AcronymDefinition
LTDVLead Tester Dual Voltage (electronics)
References in periodicals archive ?
(173) Hopkins Plaster Industries Pty Ltd v USG Interiors Australia Pty Ltd [2002] VSC 293, [1 I J; HW Thompson Building Pty Ltdv Allen Property Services Pty Ltd (1983) 48 ALR 667, 675.
(134) Spycatcher (1988) 165 CLR 30, 50-1 (Brennan J); Shaw Savill & Albion Co Ltdv Commonwealth (1940) 66 CLR 344, 363 (Dixon J) ('Shaw Savill'); Engelke v Musmann [1928] AC 433, 443 (Lord Buckmaster).
But his Honour concluded that 'this is not a case of the class' where the result 'may be so irrational that the court is forced to the conclusion that the draftsman has made a mistake': at 468, quoting Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltdv Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 147 CLR 297, 304 (Gibbs C J).
(1) Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co Ltdv English [I938] AC 57, 65 (Lord Thankerton) ('Wilsons').
(179) One important implied right arising from Constitution ss 7, 24, 64, 128 concerns the implied freedom of political communication: see Nationwide News Pty Ltdv Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1; Australian Capital Television Pty LM v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106; Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520, 559 (Brennan CJ, Dawson, Gaudron, Gummow, Kirby, McHugh and Toohey JJ).
In Chasfild Pty Ltdv Taranto [1991] 1 VR 225, 228-9, 234-5, Gray J reintroduced a conception of qualified indefeasibility into Victorian law through a broad reading of s 44(1) of the Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic).
(310) 117 York Street Pty Ltdv Proprietors of Strata Plan No 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504, 511-12 (Hodgson CJ in Eq).
(6) See, eg, Twinsectra Ltdv Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164, 194 (Lord MilleR); Criterion Properties plc v Stratford UK Properties LLC [2004] 1 WLR 1846, 1849 (Lord Nicholls).
(8) See, eg, Koorootang Nominees Pry Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1998] 3 VR 16, 100-5 (Hansen J) ('Koorootang'); NIML Ltdv Man Financial Australia Ltd [2004] VSC 449 (Unreported, Harper J, 8 November 2004) [53]-[63].
(108) Maguire v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449, 463 (Brennan CJ, Gaudron, McHugh and Gummow JJ); Clark Boyce v Mouat [1994] 1 AC 428, 437 (Lord Jauncey); Hospital Products Ltdv United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41, 96 (Mason J).
A similar issue came before Finkelstein J in Cadence Asset Management Pty Ltdv Concept Sports Ltd, (168) and his Honour again found that Houldsworth's Case was a bar to recovery.
(209) The general issue in Australian law was discussed (but not resolved) by the Full Federal Court in Anema E Core Ply Ltdv Aromas Pry Ltd [1999] FCA 904 (Unreported, Burchett, Kiefel and Hely JJ, 5 July 1999).