Compared with 3 months earlier, the related parameters of cardiac function, such as LVEF, FS, and SV, decreased obviously while both LVESV and LVEDV increased significantly.
sup], As shown in [Table 1], there were significant differences in LVEF, LVEDV, LVESV, FS, and SV among the obstruction, sham, and control groups.
lead position 98 (73) 56 (72) QRS (msec) 163 (140-184) 164 (140-184) LVEF(%) 28 (23-33) 28 (23-32) LVESV (mL) 210 (153-276) 218 (158-276) LVEDV
(mL) 303 (250-361) 308 (250-381) NYHA III, IV 115 (85) 63 (81) Hypertension 70 (52) 42 (54) Hyperlipidemia 32 (23) 16 (20) Diabetes m.
During a bed rest LVMM decreased by 8%, an average TLVPW decreased by 4%, and LVEDV
decreased by 14%.
01 versus ISO group) LVEDV
(ml) Akashi (2009) (i) Sham : 1.
LVEF(%) = (LVEDV
x 100 where LVEDV
and LVESV are the LV end diastolic and end-systolic volumes.
We also included BSA in the LVESV model, history of CAD in the LVESI model, and BSA and diabetes in the LVEDV model.
Men had higher LAV, LVEDV, LVESV, and LVESI than women (all P [less than or equal to] 0.
The preoperatively measured LA, MVA, MVG, EF, LVESD, LVEDD, LVEDV
, LVESV, LVMI values of the patients were close to each other.
Changes in cardiac function indices: The two groups had significantly increased LVEFs as well as significantly decreased LVEDVs
and LVEDDs after treatments (Pless than 0.