MCCPS

AcronymDefinition
MCCPSMarblehead Community Charter Public School (Marblehead, MA)
References in periodicals archive ?
In addition, since this study focuses on identifying the two single MCCPs for the SPC-EPC process, the classifiers in stage-2 are used to identify elements (i.e., single disturbances) consisting of the two single MCCPs.
Here, this study is mainly interested in identifying the two single mixture MCCPs for the SPC-EPC process.
The AIR values of the three MCCPs (i.e., {CYC, SYS}, {CYC, SHI}, and {SYS, SHI}) are 46.47%, 57.33%, and 59.11% for the ANN, SVM, and MARS classifiers, respectively.
Additionally, because the class values of 3, 4, and 5 in Table 2 represent the status of three MCCPs (i.e., {CYC, SYS}, {CYC, SHI}, and {SYS, SHI}), the AIR of the ANN model for the three MCCPs is computed as follows:
The value of 0 represents the presence of type I disturbances (i.e., single disturbance), the value of 1 represents the presence of type II disturbances (i.e., the MCCPs which we want to classify), and the value of 2 represents the presence of type III disturbances (i.e., the whole single CCP).
In general, the proposed BPNN-SVM and BPNN-BPNN classifiers possess satisfactory capability for identifying the MCCPs for an SPC-EPC process.
Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify MCCPs for an SPC-EPC system.
The proposed BPNN-SVM and BPNN-BPNN models achieve satisfactory performance for identifying the MCCPs for an SPC-EPC process.
Additionally, this study considered two single MCCPs identification.
Types Categories Combination Type I Single [C.sub.1] {CYC} Single [C.sub.2] {SYS} Single [C.sub.3] {SHI} Type II Two single MCCPs [C.sub.4] {CYC, SYS} Two single MCCPs [C.sub.5] {CYC, SHI} Two single MCCPs [C.sub.6] {SYS, SHI} Type III Whole single MCCP [C.sub.7] {CYC, SYS, SHI} Table 2: The confusion matrix for the ANN classifier.
Z = 3 represents the presence of the fourth combination (i.e., MCCP {CYC-SYS}).
Z = 4 represents the presence of the fifth combination (i.e., MCCP {CYC-SHI}).