MOAG

AcronymDefinition
MOAGMultiplayer Online Adventure Game
MOAGMasters of All Galaxies (role-playing game)
MOAGManual-Off-Axis-Guider (Astrodon)
MOAGMissouri Agricultural Industries Council
MOAGMother of All Groups
MOAGMother of All Grids
References in periodicals archive ?
Moreover, Bies and Moag (1986) defined it as the perception of the fairness of interpersonal treatment received during the implementation of a procedure.
Por otro lado, la justicia interactiva es definida en comportamiento del consumidor como el trato honesto, cordial y respetuoso al consumidor (Bies y Moag, 1986; Carr, 2007).
Hypotheses 3 and 4 are related to the formal procedures and interactional justice dimensions of procedural justice (Bies & Moag, 1986), and both had significant positive relationships to buy-in for all three rounds of questionnaires.
Although interactional justice is often criticised as not being an independent construct, but instead represents the interactional side of procedural justice (Greenberg 1993), a number of studies have demonstrated that people also react to their perceptions of the interactional treatment they receive from decision makers (Bies & Moag 1986, Shapiro 1993, Brockner & Wiesenfeld 1996, Rahim, Magner & Shapiro 2000).
Although initial explorations of procedural justice focused solely on formal decision processes, Bies and Moag (1986) suggested that fairness perceptions related to decision making processes are also influenced by interactional justice.
Attitudes of treating people with dignity, respect, and sincerity are effective communication for alleviating people's feelings of perceived injustice (Bies & Moag, 1986; Bies, Shapiro, & Cummings, 1988; Folger & Bies, 1989; Shapiro, Sheppard, & Cheraskin, 1992; Tyler & Bies, 1990).
People also react to their perceptions of the interpersonal treatment they receive from decision makers (Barling & Phillips, 1993; Bies and Moag, 1986; Brockner & Wiesenfeld, 1996; Rahim et al., 2000; Shapiro, 1993).
Interactional justice refers to perceptions of the quality of interactions among individuals involved in or affected by decisions (Bies & Moag, 1986).
La tercera forma de justicia, la justicia interaccional, se origina en los trabajos de Bies y Moag (1986).
247 among other striking passages); before writing about these subjects he ought first to have familiarized himself with studies such as those available in MOAG 116 (Hamburg, 1991) and MOAG 121 (Hamburg, 1994).
Interactional justice draws on the work of Bies and Moag (1986), who distinguished between the nature of the formal organizational procedures and the way they are enacted, to propose that employees also consider how fairly they are treated by decision makers.