Estimated numerical estimate of the charge [q.sub.L] on the proposed equation (6) shows that, at a given time form [T.sub.1]/[T.sub.2]=10/350 [micro]s lightning current impulse [i.sub.L](t) to (5) with the contact found normalizing factor
[k.sub.L][approximately equal to]1.054 and normalized according to the specifications requirements  The amplitude of this pulse current [I.sub.mL]=100 kA and [I.sub.mL]=200 kA it (the quantity [q.sub.L] charge) accepts numerical values, respectively 48.1 and 96.2 C.
For the first instance, at distances d/[a.sub.0] = 1/10, 1.55 and 20 between the foci of the ellipsoids, in figures 3a, 3b and 3c respectively we exhibit [[psi].sub.0,1,0]; this formula is expressed with symbolic normalizing factor [N.sub.0,1,0] because its explicit algebraic formula , which was used in the calculations to form the plot, is too long for practical presentation here.
again expressed with symbolic normalizing factor of algebraic form that becomes converted to the appropriate numerical value, displays a different transition from one limit to the other, as shown in figures 4a, 4b, 4c at distances d/[a.sub.0] = 1/10,1.55 and 20 respectively.
Key words: Jacobian theta functions, especially products; normalizing factors.
(1), (2), and (3) are independent of z, we shall refer to them as normalizing factors.
Note that the normalizing factor
[f.sub.v] remains almost unchanged despite the very different R factor in each case.
Thus, using a CH band as a normalizing factor for analyzing chemical changes in the UV degradation process might not be accurate.
Using the film thickness as a normalizing factor for analyzing the degradation rates of all FTIR absorbance including the CH band has been an alternative method of quantifying the degradation process.
(not the same as the gel time [t.sup.*]) and viscosity [[Eta].sub.*] as normalizing factors
for constructing master curves of viscosity profiles for cure.
In the absence of an explicit algebraic formula for the normalizing factor
, we apply a numerical method that yields the numerical coefficient specified within this, and other, formula in rational form.
Apart from these quantum numbers that are imposed to conform to the boundary conditions applicable to U(u) and V(v) through the associated Laguerre polynomials, and from Nu and [N.sub.v] that are normalizing factors
to be evaluated, the notation is similar to that applied for spherical polar coordinates.
Excluding the normalizing factors
outlined above, PFD's OVGR for the quarter was 1.8%.