ONSCOzark Natural Science Center (Huntsville, AR)
ONSCOffice of National Security Coordination (Departmet of Homeland Security / FEMA)
ONSCOficina Nacional de Servicio Civil (Spanish: National Civil Service Office; Uraguay)
ONSCOld North State Council (Boy Scouts of America; North Carolina)
ONSCObligaciones Negociables Subordinadas Convertibles (Spanish: Convertible Subordinated Notes; Argentina)
Copyright 1988-2018 AcronymFinder.com, All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
(70.) R v RRR, [2003] OJ No 1465 (QL) at para 13 (Sup Ct J); R v Hindessa, [2009] OJ No 6412 (QL) at para 33, 2009 CarswellOnt 9747 (WL Can) (Sup Ct J); R v Angelis, 2011 ONSC 462 at para 11, [2011] OJ No 608 (QL); R v Oigg, 2006 MBQB 68 at para 12, [2006] MJ No 166 (QL); R vArashvand, 2012 ONSC 5852 at para 42, [2012] OJ No 5255 (QL); R v Fairclough, [2003] OJ No 6314 (QL) at para 54 (Sup Ct J); R v Willis, [2005] OJ No 503 (QL) at para 5 (Sup Ct J).
(133) See R v Alexander et al, supra note 5; R v D'Souza, 2016 ONSC 2749, 339 CCC (3d) 494 (where the Court considered in part whether to grant a stay of proceedings based on the section 212 analysis undertaken by the Court in Bedford SCC in interpreting section 286.2); R v Mercer, 2016 NSPC 48, 1185 APR 355 (where the Court considered whether the actions of the police service to enforce subsection 286.1 (1) of the Criminal Code and holding a press conference identifying those charged constituted an abuse of process infringing the accused's section 7 Charter rights).
See R v Zhang, 2018 ONCJ 646; R v Badali, 2016 ONSC 788; R v Cardinal, 2018 NWTSC 12; R v Swaby, 2017 BCSC 2020, aff"d 2018 BCCA 416; R v Kakfwi, 2018 NWTSC 13; R v Dickey, 2016 BCCA 177; R v O'Neil Harriott, 2017 ONSC 3393; R v Friesen, 2015 ABQB 717; R v Hills, 2018 ABQB 945; R v Deyoung, 2016 NSPC 67; R v Hood, 2016 NSPC 78.
According to a statement released by ONSC, the two sides also held talks on ways to expand security cooperation between Kabul and Moscow as well as economic relations.
(150) R v MO, 2017 ONSC 1213 at para 24, 375 CRR (2d) 167.
(122) Unlike in Brown ONSC, Justice Nordheimer (as he then was) in Ali rejected the government's argument that the court should decline to exercise jurisdiction because the detention review process complied with the Charter.
ULC, 2016 ONSC 2980 (Can.), aff'd, 2016 ONCA 977 (Can.finding that the defendant was carrying on business in Ontario, for the purpose of the Van Breda presumptive connecting factor, based on a very limited business presence in Ontario).
Blonde, [2015] ONSC 2113 (Can.) (citing Superior Court of Justice decision enforcing cooperation with SIU).