POS2

AcronymDefinition
POS2Planet of Sound 2 (nightclub, Peterborough, England)
References in periodicals archive ?
g([[pi].sub.i]) = log([[pi].sub.i](y = 1|(Po2, Pos3, Darkness))/1 - [[pi].sub.i](y = 1|(pos2, Pos3, Darkness)))[[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1][Pos2.sub.i] + [[beta].sub.2][Pos3.sub.i] + [[beta].sub.3]Darkness + [b.sub.1][SeedLot.sub.i] + [b.sub.2][SeedGer.sub.i] (6)
[g.sup.-1]([[pi].sub.i](y = 1|(Pos2, Pos3, Darkness))) = exp{[[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1][Pos2.sub.i] + [[beta].sub.2][Pos3.sub.i] + [[beta].sub.3]Darkness}/1 + exp{[[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1][Pos2.sub.i] + [[beta].sub.2][Pos3.sub.i] + [[beta].sub.3]Darkness}, (7)
Confirmatory factor analysis of the model components Latent variable Standard R2 Cronbach (1) Satisfaction and 0.84 motivation (JSM) JSM1 0.703 0.582 JSM3 0.736 0.64 JSM4 0.799 0.54 JSM5 0.763 0.49 (2) Perceived organizational 0.86 support (POS) POS1 0.835 0.55 POS2 0.834 0.70 POS4 0.74 0.70 (4) Perceived usefulness of 0.85 social networks (PUSN) PUSN1 0.598 0.65 PUSN2 0.859 0.76 PUSN3 0.87 0.74 PUSN4 0.804 0.36 Latent variable Composed Average variance reliability (CR) extracted (AVE) (1) Satisfaction and 0.84 0.56 motivation (JSM) JSM1 JSM3 JSM4 JSM5 (2) Perceived organizational 0.85 0.65 support (POS) POS1 POS2 POS4 (4) Perceived usefulness of 0.87 0.63 social networks (PUSN) PUSN1 PUSN2 PUSN3 PUSN4 Source: own elaboration.
The two different positions, which were examined for the injection-molded plates with 90[degrees]C mold temperature ("Pos1" and "Pos2" in Table 6), show no significant differences in long period, lamellar thickness, and amorphous layer thickness.
The comparison of the CT specimens obtained from plate positions 1 and 2 ("Pos1" and "Pos2" in Table 7) shows that at position 2 the total crystallinity is similar or slightly higher, but the quality of the crystal packing is lower (higher fraction of (100), smaller or similar fraction of (105), (115), and (205)).
where Pos1 represents the set of the feature points in the left image and Pos2 represents the set of the feature points in the right image.
0 1 Vel5 Vel4 Comando Bit 3 Bit 2 Bit 1 Bit 0 Servo motor Pos3 Pos2 Posl PosO Motor de paso Giro-Der Vel3 Vel2 Vell VelO Motorde paso Giro-lzq.
For both groups the perceived muscle pain increased along the task (P <0.01), with higher values to PLA group when compared to CAF group immediately after sprint sets (POS1) (P <0.05) and immediately after Yo-Yo IRT (POS2) (P < 0.01) (Fig.
Thread ID Pos1 Pos2 Pos3 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 4 3 1 2 5 4 1 2 6 5 1 3 4 5 1 3 5 7 1 3 6 8 1 4 5 9 1 4 6 10 1 5 6 11 2 3 4 12 2 3 5 13 2 3 6 14 2 4 5 15 2 4 6 16 2 5 6 17 3 4 5 18 3 4 6 19 3 S 6 20 4 5 6 Figure 6.
POSTED OFFER MARKETS POS1 YES NO 1:1 2.60 10 POS2 YES NO 1:1 6.10 10 POXS1 YES YES 2:1 2.60 16 POXS2 YES YES 2:1 6.85 25 PO1 NO NO 2:1 6.10 20 PO2 NO NO 2:1 4.60 20 POX1 NO YES 2:1 6.10 20 POX2 NO YES 2:1 7.25 25
First, two individuals are randomly selected in the population, with two positions, pos1 and pos2 (pos1 < pos2), randomly generated.