References in periodicals archive ?
PPITS was essentially an employment agency for PPIN and Defendant PSL,
to PPIN and Defendant PSL, Defendant PPITS recruited Johnson.
argued that PSL was an alter ego of PPITS; therefore, PPITS's
overlap between the two entities" (50) and that PPITS and
jurisdiction over PSL because PSL and PPITS had observed
The court granted PPITS's motion for summary judgment on its
PPITS argued that it was not Johnson's employer, and therefore
The court agreed, holding that PPITS did not exert sufficient control
some PPITS employees supervised Johnson, the court found that these
subjective beliefs that PPITS, PSL, and PPIN were the same entity.
After the court granted PPITS's motion for summary judgment,
Acronyms browser ?
Full browser ?