Also found in: Wikipedia.
PRHSPaso Robles High School (California)
PRHSPine Ridge High School (Pine Ridge, South Dakota)
PRHSPalmetto Ridge High School (Naples, FL)
PRHSPearl River High School
PRHSPeachtree Ridge High School
PRHSPentucket Regional High School (West Newbury, MA)
PRHSPlymouth Regional High School
PRHSPort Richmond High School (Staten Island, NY)
PRHSPine-Richland High School (Gibsonia, PA)
PRHSPinelands Regional High School (Tuckerton, NJ)
PRHSPine River High School
PRHSPalawan Resort Hotel Systems, Inc. (Philippines)
PRHSPeter Rabbit Home School (New Mexico)
PRHSPoint Reyes Headland South (California)
References in periodicals archive ?
Jamie Marker is a senior and book club co-vice-president at PRHS.
It is worth repeating that the 2004 round of the PRHS covered Punjab and Sindh provinces, so the models 3 and 4 are limited to rural areas of these two provinces.
1488 N 1,311 986 977 Source: Authors' estimation from the micro-data of PRHS 2001 and PPHS 2010.
Table 2 Proportion of Beneficiary Women in 2001 and 2010 (%) PPHS2010 PRHS 2001 Quintile Total Urban Rural Rural Only Qi 50.
Table-A1 Households Covered during the Three Waves of the Panel Survey PRHS 2004 Panel Split Total House- House- PRHS holds holds 2001 Pakistan 2721 1614 293 1907 Punjab 1071 933 146 1079 Sindh 808 681 147 828 KP 447 -- -- -- Balochistan 395 -- -- -- PPHS 2010 Panel Split Total Urban Total House- House- Rural House- Sample holds holds house- holds holds Pakistan 2198 602 2800 1342 4142 Punjab 893 328 1221 657 1878 Sindh 663 189 852 359 1211 KP 377 58 435 166 601 Balochistan 265 27 292 160 452
The 2004 PRHS includes a census of schools within each village.
Balochistan was not part of the IFPRI panel so the PRHS included three districts from Balochistan, namely Loralai, Khuzdar and Gawadar (Table 1).
The second notable thing was that only a sub-sample of PRHS data was used.
In the combined panel of IFPRI (1990-91) and PRHS (2001), chronic poor were 35 percent.
Table 2 summarises the PRHS data for average household characteristics according to operated farm size, dividing farms into four separate categories: households without operated agricultural land (but with livestock or land leasing as main income source), small farms (up to 4 acres), medium farms (between 4 and 20 acres), and large farms (more than 20 acres).
This PRHS survey covers information regarding crops output and inputs at the plot-level.
The results suggest that farm incomes are even more highly skewed than indicated in the HIES or the PRHS, and that the importance of non-farm incomes in total rural household incomes is generally understated in the household survey data.