SRMPSoap Reliable Messaging Protocol
SRMPSpider Remote Monitoring Protocol (193 for Both UDP, TCP)
SRMPSecurity Risk Management Plan (information security; various organizations)
SRMPSustainable Resource Management Plan
SRMPState Route Milepost
SRMPSprint Retiree Medical Plan
SRMPSupply Readiness Management Plan
SRMPStatus Request Multi-Polling
SRMPSOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) Reliable Messaging Protocol (computer networking)
References in periodicals archive ?
All 4 SRMPs have documented good results in the IFCC and NGSP monitoring programs [CV <3.
As for fact (ii), owing to the SRMP given in section 3.
The predication of the manner phrase kuai with such a propositional sentential subject will violate the SRMP, as the sentential subject ta bu pao does not contain any free variable, let alone a free event or situation variable required by the predicate kuai.
Hence, the tripartite structure will always guarantee the combination of such a manner phrase and perfective -le with the verb first, that is, binding the required event or situation variable or having the required sentential subject of an event or a situation type, avoiding any violation of PVB or SRMP.
Beginning in January 2014, 37 of 40 results need to be within 6% (relative) of an individual NGSP SRMP to pass certification (12).
Thirty-seven of 40 results need to be within 6% (relative) of the NGSP SRMP to pass certification.
However, in an attempt to strengthen our argument, we used 3 SRMPs and calibrated with IFCC secondary reference material; therefore, the values are as close as possible to the true value and are likely more reliable than comparing with just 1 SRMP.
1c], glycated hemoglobin; NGSP, National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program; SRMP, secondary reference measurement procedure; MDP, medical decision point; DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; RCV, reference change value.
17 Comparison Samples NGSP > 6% of criteria SRMP, n B-analyst (y) vs Premier (x) 2 Pass vs Tina-quant (x) (c) 1 Pass vs Tosoh G8 (x) 2 Pass DCA Vantage (y) vs Premier (x) 0 Pass vs Tina-quant (x) (c) 0 Pass vs Tosoh G8 (x) 1 Pass Afinion (y) vs Premier (x) (c) 0 Pass vs Tina-quant (x) 2 Pass vs Tosoh G8 (x) 3 Pass Quo-Test (y) vs Premier (x) (c) 11 Fail vs Tina-quant (x) 5 Fail vs Tosoh G8 (x) 5 Fail Quo-Lab (y) vs Premier (x) (c) 14 Fail vs Tina-quant (x) 12 Fail vs Tosoh G8 (x) 15 Fail InnovaStar (y) vs Premier (x) 15 Fail vs Tina-quant (x) (c) 9 Fail vs Tosoh G8 (x) 8 Fail Cobas B101 (y) vs Premier (x) 4 Fail vs Tina-quant (x) (c) 5 Fail vs Tosoh G8 (x) 1 Pass (a) Thirty-seven of 40 results need to be within 6% (relative) of the NGSP SRMP to pass certification.
Values were assigned to the fresh patient samples by the 3 SRMPs mentioned below.
The CLSI EP-9 protocol was performed twice with 2 different reagent lot numbers, and the data were used to investigate the bias between the POC instruments and the 3 SRMPs (n = 40, 5 days, duplicate measurements) (9).
The instruments were compared to the 3 SRMPs with 2 different reagent lot numbers and also with the mean 3 SRMPs (Fig.