The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
goes into great detail concerning auditors and a commission to oversee them.
This is necessary risk management in the brave new world of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The good news: Since January 2004, FEI has been monitoring the costs incurred by member companies to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
, and these costs seem to have finally stabilized.
A January 2004 Financial Executives International (FEI) survey of more than 300 of its members who work in public companies of all sizes revealed those entities expected to spend more time and money to comply with the section 404 internal-control requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
than anticipated in a smaller poll taken less than a year ago (www.
Securities and Exchange Commission finalized some of the rules required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
, which calls for the most sweeping changes to financial reporting by publicly traded companies since the stock market crashed in 1929.
A summary of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
is available at www.
This analogy aptly applies to financial executives going through year-one compliance for Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Meanwhile, the public company accounting standards and federal regulations implementing the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
continued to develop.
How does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
impact your records and information management (RIM) program?