References in periodicals archive ?
CT, IVT, ASLA, KCF, TGPR and our WLSRE method can successfully track most frames.
SPT, ASLA, IVT and LSST lose track of the target when motion blur occurs, whereas KCF, TGPR and our WLSRE method perform favorably (see #375 and #570).
In the David2 sequence, KCF, TGPR, IVT, ASLA and our WLSRE method perform well and achieve outstanding performance.
sequence LSST SPT IVT ASLA CT KCF TGPR Basketball 107.94 5.97 107.11 82.63 89.11 8.07 9.43 doll 12.08 40.01 32.65 11.84 21.82 8.27 5.97 boy 109.29 57.62 91.25 106.07 9.03 2.67 3.38 Car4 2.66 113.84 2.15 1.59 86.03 9.47 6.
Frag, TGPR, VTD, and L1 lose the target and track the other similar object until the end of whole sequence.
Struck, LSHT, and TGPR achieve accurate tracking results.
Compared with these algorithms, LRT, TGPR, and the proposed tracking algorithm can track the target successfully.
Struck, TGPR and the proposed tracking algorithm can track the target throughout the sequence.
Influenced by drastic illumination variations, VTD, Frag, and TGPR lose the target after the 40th frame until the end of the sequence.
VTD, TGPR, and LSHT can not accurately evaluate the scale variation.
Acronyms browser ?
Full browser ?
- TGR 14