References in periodicals archive ?
Figure 3 shows the estimated G values (mean [+ or -] SD) in mg/min for the total material from the UV-absorbance measured by the DIAMON prototype, from mDDQ and from VVSP UKM using blood and dialysate urea samples.
4), calculated as 0.58, V was by the Watson formula 74.84 [+ or -] 16.33 ( 30), N = by mDDQ 58.04 [+ or -] 14.31 ( 29), N = and by VVSP UKM 67.58 [+ or -] 13.31 ( 30).
Figure 5 depicts the nPNA values (mean [+ or -] SD) for the total material from the UV-absorbance, measured by the DIAMON prototype, from mDDQ, and from VVSP UKM calculations, normalized by 0.58 V and by the dry body weight, efBW.
The mean values from DIAMON and mDDQ were slightly lower compared to VVSP UKM being still not statistically different.
The BW from mDDQ was lower than BW from the anthropometric and VVSP UKM methods, or measured as efBW.
Figure 5 indicates higher nPNA with mDDQ and VVSP UKM compared to TRU-based equation, used by DIAMON when normalized by the anthropometric and the kinetic body weights.
Acronyms browser ?
Full browser ?