s baseline score of 82 WCPM
was at approximately the 10th percentile for a fifth grade student in winter according to aggregated norms provided by Aims Web (Pearson, 2010).
In order to measure WCPM
and use data to make instructional decisions, CBM protocol for scoring oral reading fluency probes was utilized throughout the case study.
per week to achieve a post-intervention goal of 78 WCPM
increase from the 71 WCPM
The parent repeats steps 1-9 TABLE 3 Pre and Post Criterion Measures Pre WCPM
Sight Flynt-Cooter Flynt-Cooter Word Oral Reading Comprehension Accuracy Student 1 69 114 Level 1 Level 1 Student 2 41 115 Level 1 Level 1 Students 55 114.
were also evaluated in comparison to national norms.
is a measure of oral or aloud reading fluency or speed of accurate aloud reading.
Percent ISA was calculated for each WCPM
and reading comprehension using a point-by-point method, by dividing the number of agreements by the number of agreements plus disagreements, multiplied by 100.
was calculated by taking the total number of words read correctly in each paragraph or group of 10 words (i.
Given 16 weeks of supplemental online instruction, his WCPM
changed visibly in both level and slope.
They can listen to and mark students recorded assessments at their convenience and get automatically generated WCPM
and prosody scores.
First and second grade frustrational levels are defined as reading less than 40 WCPM
and having more than 4 EPM; instructional level is reading 40 to 60 WCPM
and having 4 or less EPM, and mastery level is reading more than 60 WCPM
with 4 or less EPM.
Fluency Tutor then automatically generates WCPM
(Words Correct Per Minute) and prosody scores.