Z-A

AcronymDefinition
Z-AZero All
References in periodicals archive ?
Figures 4(a) and 4(b) shows the comparison of shear angle values for the Experiments and the J-C and Z-A models.
Figures 5 (a), 5(b), 5(c) and 5(d) show the FEM contours for effective stress distribution for the J-C and Z-A models for cutting speeds of 34 m/min and 82 m/min at a feed rate of 0.159 mm/rev.
Figures 6 (a), 6 (b), 6(c) and 6(d) show the FEM contours for effective strain for the J-C and Z-A models for cutting speeds of 34 m/min and 82 m/min at feed rate of 0.159 mm/rev.
Figures 7(a), 7(b), 7(c) and 7(d) show the FEM contours for effective strain rate distribution for the J-C and Z-A models for cutting speeds of 34 m/min and 82 m/min at feed rate of 0.159 mm/rev.
Figures 8(a), 8(b), 8(c), 8(d) show the FEM contours for temperature distribution for the J-C and Z-A model for cutting speeds of 34 and 82 m/min and a feed rate of 0.l59 mm/rev.
The FEM results for both the cutting speeds produced low values for the cutting force due to the reduced flow stress values computed with the J-C and Z-A models.